Feeds:
Posts
Comments

I recently led a training with seven organizations on digital storytelling.  All had one thing in common.  They were all featured case studies in a report titled “Strengthening Democracy, Increasing Opportunities” published by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy. The report “looks at data from 15 Minnesota nonprofits, which shows high return on investments and non-monetary gains on a range of issues including housing, civil rights, transportation and access to medical care.”

In partnership with NCRP and Headwaters Foundation for Justice (member of Minnesota MAG-Net), Main Street Project led a day long training on digital storytelling which resulted in seven powerful stories from organizations featured in the report.  The goal of the training in short was to bring the report alive through the  voices of the people who carry out that work on a daily basis.  Without it, as trainer amalia deloney said, “they’re just numbers on a page.”

Although the stories were very different, it was exciting to be around people who were truly passionate about their respective work.  Many felt some anxiety over the ability to edit their stories on a computer.  These are concerns and real barriers to our ability to communicate our stories in the digital age.  Placestories, the digital storytelling software we use, helps to bridge the technological gaps that many feel are holding them back.  The finished stories, of which a couple are sampled below, incorporate people’s own cultural knowledge of storytelling and makes the software work for them.  Not the other way around.  To view all of the stories click here

Signs are that the economic freefall of the past several years is beginning to reverse, as the federal stimulus package puts millions of unemployed workers back to work. Still, for far too many, Labor Day 2009 remains less a celebration of the hard work that built our nation than grim reminder of how far we still have to go.

Families living and working in rural communities know this firsthand, given they’re typically the last to profit from economic booms yet are among the first to go bust. That’s backed by the state’s latest Job Vacancy Survey, which reports 21,000 unemployed workers in and around Winona are vying for only 2,200 openings. As bad as it is, even that doesn’t tell the whole story.

In its analysis of the Survey, the JOBS NOW Coalition concluded of the openings more than half are part time, 65 percent require no education or training beyond high school and one in four pays less than $8.25 an hour, well below what is needed just to make ends meet.

But with such catastrophe comes great opportunity to rebuild an economy that works.

“Our decades-long experiment in free trade has now been judged a failure,” says Richard Levins, professor emeritus of applied economics at the University of Minnesota. “We need to go back to building a middle class in ways that work.”

Global corporations and their friends in Washington are quick to blame labor unions for America’s decline. Through billions spent in a three-decade propaganda campaign, many rank-and-file workers bought into the fiction, even as their own buying power failed to keep pace with costs. But unions aren’t the enemy of the middle class, as global corporations would have us believe; the opposite, in fact, is true: All workers benefit when labor unions are strong.

Proving that point are places like Newton, a town of 16,000 in central Iowa. In 2006, after a century of manufacturing Maytag appliances, the company was bought out and its union jobs transferred to low-paying plants in Mexico and Ohio. According to Iowa Workforce Development, a state agency, Maytag’s pay and benefits packages raised nonunion wages countywide by $3 an hour. The loss of Maytag not only impacted town residents but decimated the middle-class standing of thousands of working families miles beyond.

“The historical record is clear: Labor unions built the American middle class; labor unions bargain for the wages needed to restore the middle class to prosperity,” Levins says. “We can’t build a middle class on cheap wages and personal borrowing. Things just don’t work that way. We have to remember that middle-class economies don’t just happen; we can’t take them for granted. They have to be built and maintained. Labor unions do that job.”

In 1929, the top 1 percent of Americans claimed nearly a quarter of all wealth. In 1979, when labor unions were strong, the percentage of wealth concentrated among the super-rich dropped by more than half, to its lowest point in modern history. With the attack on unions – and the diminished power of workers overall – the trend once again reversed: In recent years 300,000 Americans at the top of the economic chain had incomes nearly matching 150 million wage-earners below.

“Just as Wal-Mart depresses wages and living standards for all workers, labor unions do the opposite,” says Kevin Ristau, education director with JOBS NOW.

We set aside this day to recognize the value of workers and their contributions to our nation. With much-needed change in federal policy strengthening the position of workers, Americans will rise above their current place as cheap commodity in a global market. And once done, we all will have much more to celebrate the first Monday in September.

Published in Winona Daily News.

Is it me or has it been an exceptionally bizarre few weeks on the health care reform front?

Opponents of health care reform, many of them hired by the insurance lobby, have stepped up their threats in recent days, alleging that congressional plans will mandate such things as death panels, forced abortions and rationed care (like a $5,000 deductible doesn’t ration care already?).  And they’ve cranked up the volume on their rants as well, often making it impossible for other voices to be heard at dozens of town hall meetings throughout the country. That’s a shame.

It’s hard to imagine how such outrageous and false claims can continue to show up in the media when they have been debunked time and time again. But the insurance industry is desperately trying to maintain the status quo, and will do and spend whatever it takes.

The real threat in this health care debate will come if the insurance companies succeed and reform efforts fail, putting additional millions of Americans and thousands of small businesses at risk, especially in rural areas.

No question, insurance company plans have failed rural America. They profit by denying care to people and we all pay the price.

We see the effects of this economic rationing today in rural communities, where much of our health care infrastructure has been lost. Without hospitals and clinics, the crisis in affordability has now grown to be a crisis in access as well.

Doing nothing is not an option.  Neither is tinkering around with insurance. Nothing short of a new public plan, one that is efficient, moral, and universal will make health care available in rural America. That’s why we’re joining the fight for reform, and asking you to do the same.

Call it a ‘public option.’ Call it ‘Medicare/Medicaid for all.’ Just don’t call it ‘reform’ without it.

By Alan Guebert

Maybe this is what Willie and Waylon were thinking when they warned American “mommas” to not let their “babies to grow up to be cowboys:” Anyone with a dairy cow this year will lose, on average, $70 per month feeding and milking it; more if the cow is also packin’ debt.

That means, in the Great White Washout of 2009, a moderately-sized dairy farm – say, a family operation with 200 cows – will lose nearly $170,000 making milk. If the family has a banker as a partner, as 70 percent of all U.S. dairymen do, the family will likely lose more $1,000 per cow, or $200,000, this year.

The catastrophic losses mean people and cows are running, not walking, out milking parlors nationwide. Vermont, where cows are as hallowed as their owners’ flintiness, has already lost 40 of its 1,000 dairies with hundreds more at risk. Pennsylvania officials estimate the state will lose 25 percent of its 7,400 dairy farmers before prices turn.

All of this calamity comes just two short years after farm milk prices made record highs, over $21 per one hundred pounds, or cwt., the farm unit all milk is sold by. Today, prices are half that.

In fact, in July 14 testimony before the House Ag Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry, Jim Miller, under secretary of agriculture for Farm and Foreign Ag Services, estimated this year’s on-farm milk price will average just $12.15 per cwt., the “lowest annual price received by farmers for milk since 1979.”

Contrast the price received for milk to the prices paid for making it. In his House testimony, Miller reported that feed costs alone – mind you, no labor, energy, insurance, land or taxes – in California, the nation’s largest milk producer, in May were $12.19 per cwt. That makes dairying a less-than-zero profession.

More importantly, says dairyman John Bunting, the folks exiting dairying because of today’s absurdly low prices are its younger, more-likely-to-be-indebted generation.

“In short,” he opines from his New York dairy barn July 15, “this nation currently seems to have public policy that favors dairy farmers over age 70 than those younger than 50. How do you think that’s going to work out in the coming years?”

It will be a disaster – “an absolute calamity,” is how Bunting describes it – for consumers, processors and farmers because today’s sustained crushing prices will force younger farmers and older bankers alike to leave the dairying forever.

Miller, despite his bleak House testimony, believes milk prices will rebound to an average $15.60 in 2010.

In the meantime, he suggests, USDA’s current tools – government purchases of butter, cheese, and non-fat dry milk to boost support prices and fatten food aid programs, and MILC, the Milk Income Loss Contract program that will pay farmers an estimated $900 million this year – will, hopefully, give many farmers enough cash to make it through 2009’s train wreck.

Bunting, who maintains a lively blog at http://johnbuntingsjournal.blogspot.com/ and writes for The Milkweed, a Wisconsin-based monthly dairy newspaper, ain’t buying it. This crack-up’s swiftness and severity, he says, shows U.S. milk policy for what it is: totally inadequate and completely opaque.

“No one in Washington knows how milk is priced anymore,” he says, “or how easily those prices are manipulated by the very few, very big dairy coops and processors. And because they don’t know, they can’t fix it.”

Under the present policy, Bunting notes, dairy farmers have only two avenues when low prices strike – leave dairying or get more cows. The former is usually unacceptable, the latter “certainly shortsighted.”

He’s right; dairymen like him “got milk;” too much, in fact. What they have a shortage of, however, is leadership.

© 2009 ag comm

Women from CrossingBarriers and All Parks Alliance for Change make their videos

Women from CrossingBarriers and All Parks Alliance for Change make their videos

Storytelling predates the written word. People have been telling stories for as long as we have had speech. Stories are learned image-by-image, rather than word-by-word, and are retold from the heart. Throughout history, stories have been used to educate, express, advocate and organize. It is through the sharing of stories that communities build their identities, pass on traditions, and construct meaning.

50+ Group Leader from Twin Cities Community Voice Mail

50+ Group Leader from Twin Cities Community Voice Mail

When a story is shared, a powerful connection is built –and from this connection personal stories have the ability to move both the storyteller and the listener to create a shared political view of the world…and then of course, move towards collective action. Adapted from Fourth World Rising, Main Street Project, Third World Majority, and the Center for Digital Storytelling 9/15/06

Across the United States, movement-building organizations are placing storytelling central to their organizing. In Philadelphia, the Media Mobilizing Project’s slogan is “movements begin with the telling of untold stories.” Here in Minneapolis, the Main Street Project believes that “one-by-one we reach people, share our stories, and build relationships.” Recently, as part of our Justice 2.0 Initiative, we started to lead “Storytelling for Social Change” workshops. In these trainings, we teach community members that “everyone has a powerful story to tell, because we all see, hear, and perceive the world in different ways.”  We believe that the power of storytelling in organizing is its ability to create empathy and build relationships between different people and communities by connecting both the storyteller and the listener within a common narrative.

Staff and Community from Just Equity make a video about the impact of Light Rail on St. Paul's Rondo Neighborhood

Staff and Community from Just Equity make a video about the impact of Light Rail on St. Paul's Rondo Neighborhood

For the historically disenfranchised communities we work with (whether migrant, communities of color, or low-income) we know that survival depends on maintaining the identities, languages, and traditions that hold a community together. To this end, media–in our own hands–can be a valuable storytelling tool that supports our self-determination, preserves our collective identity, and strengthens our struggles for social and economic justice.

Recently, the Headwaters Foundation for Justice awarded $215,000 to 24 Minnesota-based not-for-profit organizations. In keeping with Headwaters’ mission to support grassroots organizations and promote social, racial, economic and environmental justice, grants were given to organizations that address systems change. All grantees were invited to participate in a 2-part “Storytelling for Social Change” workshop with us. In the first session, participants learned about the application of storytelling in a variety of contexts, and the potential of multimedia technology to support the use of narrative in their organizing.

In the second session, participants developed a multimedia narrative related to their Headwaters Social Change grant. Take a minute and watch the short videos these organizations created, and reflect on what it could look like if our communities had the media skills, digital literacy, technology and access to create media about the root causes of the problems we face.

By Alan Guebert

When the international trade portion of your resume is as thin as Ron Kirk’s – you do remember that Kirk, the former mayor of Dallas, is now U.S. Trade Representative, don’t you – likely you’d stress personal ideals over professional accomplishments when talking about your new job.

Kirk did just that in a May 22 speech to the U.S. Meat Export Federation. As Barack Obama’s trade ambassador, Kirk explained, he’d be guided by “raging sense of pragmatism and a practical sense of urgency.”

Golly, I’m pretty familiar with the English language but I have no idea what that gibberish means. Maybe it’s Texican for Hey, I’m two months into this job so don’t complain until I actually do something.

If so, fair enough because Kirk is stepping into one of the darkest, most unexplored corners of the Obama White House where few even talk about trade let alone promote it.

And for good reason; trade policy -and, specifically, the North American Free Trade Agreement -was one of the few banana peels Obama slipped on during his otherwise textbook-perfect 2008 presidential race.

More importantly, since taking office the job-crushing recession has pushed trade even farther down the Administration’s to-do list.

Events, however, keep trying to raise it back up. The H1N1 swine flu outbreak clobbered U.S. pork exports and, in turn, U.S. hog markets, despite no known link between pigs, their meat and the disease.

The global flu reaction did give Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack another chance to promote a proposed – and still going nowhere after five years and $130 million of federal promotion – mandatory, national animal identification program as a way to quickly counter regional and global market concerns.

Just as the scare was building, April 29, a U.S. Department of Agriculture report sternly warned American ranchers and farmers that the continued lack of a national livestock tracking system might soon cost the beef sector $13.2 billion a year in lost sales to other nations, like Canada and Australia, who already have trace-back programs.

Most U.S. producers, however, see mandatory livestock ID as a costly, unnecessary government intrusion into their business. USDA admits that only 510,000 of 1.4 million U.S. livestock farms have voluntarily signed on to the current premise ID program.

Indeed, NAIS, the acronym for USDA’s ailing National Animal Identification effort, is an almost perfect example of what Kirk and his band of raging pragmatists face. NAIS, say trade experts, is an imperative for future growth of U.S. meat exports and yet there aren’t 10 cowboys west of the Potomac – let alone the Pecos – in any state that support it.

Can Kirk and his “practical sense of urgency” – or more truthfully, anyone -solve the dilemma? Not likely; NAIS is headed to the back burner to simmer for the summer.

It will have plenty of company. Already there are the pending free trade deals with Peru… and Panama… and Columbia… and (yawn) Korea and no one in Congress wants to stir any of ‘em. Then there’s that messy stew called Doha.

The front burners warm a few kettles of fish, too. One has our NAFTA partners, Canada and Mexico, claiming America’s finally-implemented country of origin labeling law is trade restrictive; both want the World Trade Organization to broaden it or boot it.

And that’s just Kirk’s crowded starting point. Just how confusing is it for this former mayor? The last ag trade press release posted on the trade rep’s website (http://www.ustr.gov/) is dated Nov. 1, 2008, three days before his boss’s election.

Then again, maybe Kirk’s urgent inaction simply means that the Boss prefers no trade deal over a bad trade deal. How, ah, pragmatic.

I got a call on a Thursday afternoon from the White House Office of Public Liaison inviting me to a roundtable discussion on rural health care reform at the Executive Office Building the following Monday. Conference calls were not an option, so recalling my friend and colleague Dee Davis’ admonition: “When the White House calls, you go,” I got the ticket and went.

HHS Rural Report

HHS Rural Report

The May 4 meeting, fourth in a series of stakeholder gatherings, was chaired by Nancy-Ann DeParle, Counselor to the President and Director of the White House Office of Health Reform, and featured Dr. Mary Wakefield, Administrator at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Tina Tchen, Director of the White House Office of Public Liaison, and Representative Mike Ross (D-AR) who serves on the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee of Energy and Commerce. It coincided with the release of a new report from HHS entitled “Hard Times in the Heartland: Health Care in Rural America.”

It was my privilege to be there representing the League of Rural Voters and the National Rural Assembly, alongside farmers and ranchers from around the country, leaders from the National Farmers Union, National Family Farm Coalition and Farm Bureau Federation, and experts from the National Rural Health Association, Rural Policy Research Institute, Fishing Partnership Health Plan, Center for Rural Affairs and others.

The 90-minute discussion focused on the rising cost of health insurance to farm families and the shrinking number of health care professionals practicing in rural America. Rep. Cox made it clear that major reform of the system was necessary to keep the costs of Medicare and Medicaid from swamping the federal budget.

As I waited for my turn to speak, I got thinking about the sad spectacle of dialysis clinics springing up across the country in response to the explosion of obesity-related diabetes, which is of course, completely preventable. How much does all that treatment cost?

I recalled the school lunches that were part of my experience some 40 years ago: balanced meals made fresh each day (with USDA-provided ingredients) by a half dozen real cooks in the kitchen. The dishes were not disposable and you ate what was in front of you (except for the beets!).

I also remembered when Pepsi and Coke took over the high school vending areas to help the school “earn” money, and marveled years later at how city schools turned over their food service to Pizza Hut and Taco Bell.

And now we have an epidemic of obesity, diabetes and heart disease that is killing us, literally and figuratively. Coincidence? I don’t think so.

So I thanked the Administration for the opportunity, noted the burgeoning costs of diet-related health problems like obesity, diabetes and heart disease and stressed the need for a systems approach to health care reform.

I encouraged us all to focus attention on improving diet and nutrition among youth and senior populations as one strategy for reducing long-term health care costs – a strategy which would also expand local and regional markets for food and farm products.

I finished by acknowledging that President Obama has done a great job of connecting the dots on a number of complex issues already and reiterated my hope that the Administration would continue to help rural America connect the dots on this challenge as well. Healthy food, healthy kids, healthy economies, healthy communities: we have the opportunity to make progress on all our goals simultaneously.

Older Posts »